If you already use twitter, you can probably skip this mammoth post and go straight to Part 2, when it appears, which will be my actual #followfriday list. Or you can keep reading and see if my experience tallies in any way with your own. Hell, if it doesn’t, let me know - I’m intrigued by the twitter phenomenon, so tell me what it is about it that floats your boat.
I joined twitter on the 8th of February 2009 (according to http://whendidyoujointwitter.appspot.com/) purely due to an article in a Sunday magazine which listed some celebrities who used the service. It was the first time I’d heard of it. While I have a Facebook page, it rarely gets used. FriendsReunited was joined then forgotten. I’ve never been into Myspace and the “professional” equivalents like LinkedIn just piss me off. I can’t even be bothered to keep up with my email most of the time. In short, while I definitely class myself as a nerd, I’ve never been interested in using technology to communicate (I imagine my wife would say that’s true of my mouth, too. Let’s say I can be fairly taciturn and leave it there, OK?)
Anyway, I remember well my first look at the twitter website. It was a Sunday evening, in bed, on my Nokia N810. What I saw: a page full of random comments by random people. I frowned and ploughed through a couple of pages. What bollocks was this? My wife, reading an actual book next to me, looked over, turned her nose up at it and resumed the physical act of turning pages. I can’t say I blamed her. Determined to understand it though, if only to discount it later, I created an account and went to sleep.
The next morning, I had another go on the train to work. I figured out the “following” premise pretty quickly(I’m not as stupid as I look) and picked up @neilhimself, @JohnCleese, @Wossy, @stephenfry, @RealDMitchell and @elimanning. I watched their updates for a day or so. Which is to say I watched @stephenfry do amazing things with 140 characters on a fairly frequent basis, @Wossy tweet what he was eating or who he was playing tennis with, @neilhimself plug whatever public events he or his books were happening in the near future (sorry, I absolutely adore Neil Gaiman’s writing, but his twitter feed comes across as an advertising stream at times. When he does tweet something non-promotional, it’s invariably a nugget of beautiful prose. EDIT – I guess all the advertising was basically the run-up to the Coraline release. He’s much more himself now, and who am I to gripe about someone with an amazing talent promoting their product?). @RealDMitchell and @elimanning remained silent (I lie - just looked - @elimanning tweeted “pro bowl was fun” on the 9th, and @RealDMitchell tweeted once on the 9th and once on the 10th!). I had my first Twitter epiphany:
Twitter is for getting a closer look at geeky celebrities‘ lives.
Cool. Happy with my discovery, I started following as many celebs as I could find. It quickly became obvious that most were either using it as a self-promotional tool, tweeting such inanity that I quickly gave up on them, or not tweeting at all. I won’t name and shame the offenders. I did, however, find a few twitterers who entertained me - @ICHCheezburger, @darthvader, @charltonbrooker, @donttrythis and @ferretprincess.
And, for a week or so, that was that. I’d log on every now and then, tweet what I was having for lunch, and check who @wossy was playing tennis with. Then my wife’s sneers began to register. Why exactly was I doing this? I’ve never been at all interested in celebrity gossip, so why was I cyber-stalking these people, and wasting my time while doing it? But, rather than jack the whole thing in (did I mention I’m a geek? I tend not to let go of shiny new toys in a hurry), I decided that it could have one more chance. I just needed to refocus my lense.
Fatefully, almost as I had that thought, @neilhimself tweeted a recommendation for a bunch of fellow authors also active on Twitter. I’ve always admired writers, and anyone recommended by Mr Gaiman deserves a look, right? They were, in no particular order, @nalohopkinson, @david_hewson @doctorow, @Harkaway, @StevenGould and, nestled in there like a cuckoo’s egg, @ememess. Now, before you get the wrong idea here, these are ALL excellent people who write wonderfully and deserve to be followed. Do it. Now.
@ememess is just, well, different. He gets the blame for the rest of this.
To my shame, I’d never heard of any of these guys or their books. Since leaving school, I’ve grown lazy with reading. I eagerly fall, with small squeaks of glee, upon Terry Pratchett’s two books per year (also follow @terryandrob, by the way), seem to be inheriting Ian Rankin’s back catalogue from my Mother-in-law, and pick up the odd title recommended by my wife. Mainly, this lack of literary ambition is due to family, work, and my long list of nerdy pursuits, but I decided that enough was enough, and set about gathering samples of these newly-discovered writers‘ work. I’ve now got two shelves full, which I’m getting through. Slowly. But with constant and growing enjoyment. There followed my second Twepiphany;
Twitter is for expanding your horizons, whatever they may be.
I could have left it there. I was happy with my hoard of reading material, my Twitter stream was pretty much guaranteed to contain something witty or educational or thought-provoking whenever I looked at it, and I’d cut down on the cyber-diarrhoea I myself been inflicting on no-one in particular, confining my updates to those that fell close to my own definitions of “worthy“.
I’d noticed that a few of the (famous or published or both, I’ll remind you) folk I was following had followed me back, which I assumed to just be common courtesy - @stephenfry is following about 55,000 people. Ego-massaging though that was, I didn’t kid myself that they were actually reading my tweets.
Then, one day, I tweeted something acerbic about a dickhead on an escalator. When I checked my feed a little later, I found that @ememess had re-tweeted me. Erm. OK. That was a little odd. I did a mental reboot. So. Firstly, he *was* reading my tweets (or, at least, that one). Secondly, he’d thought either what I’d said or the way I’d phrased it was of sufficient quality to share with the rest of his followers. I was taken abit aback. In a very nice way. I was reading one of his books at the time, and I sent him a message (an @reply , in our terms), and he replied back. Far out. A man who has written a number of best-sellers (international best-sellers, his book jackets go to pains to point out ;-)) having an almost conversation with li’l old me.
So that was kinda cool, and I showed anyone who I though gave half a crap the tweet-from-the-famous-author, and they looked at me like I was a loon.
But they didn’t get it. And they still don’t get Twitter. While @ememess taking the time to respond to me was great, from a fan’s point of view (and I really don’t do the blithering sycophant thing), it represented much more than that to me, and ushered in the third Twepiphany;
You can actually meet new people on Twitter!
I’ve admitted, in a prior blog, just how bad I am at forging new relationships. Always have been, ever since I was little. Without being conceited, I’m fairly intelligent and personable, but put me in a room of strangers and I disappear. You know those tales of people so shy and quiet they become invisible? That’s me. But in print, my tongue doesn’t get in the way of what I want to say; and I can pull it off! Sometimes, I’m even a bit funny (Self praise is no praise, I know…).
So, anyway, here I was, with one person that I didn’t actually know in real life prepared to talk to me. The trouble was, I didn’t have anything much to say to him. Most of @ememess’s tweets are atomic little pearls of content. Amusing, off-the-wall, thought-provoking, whatever, but they’re not conversation starters. Other than “That’s really great, Mike!”, there aren’t that many adequate responses, and as I said, a sycophant I am not. And Twitter stagnated again for a few days.
I should mention that, at this point, I was making a great effort to read every single blessed tweet that my chosen followees uttered. Train journeys to and from work were spent feverishly grazing the history of the web interface (yup, I hadn’t even discovered the pantheon of Twitter clients yet). It was my version of reading the paper. I’d started following a few other authors on @ememess’s general recommendation, including @sarahjpin, with whom he bantered fairly frequently, and I enjoyed watching them squabble. Then I looked at @ememess’s actual feed. Not just the stuff I saw, but the stuff he sends to other people. People I wasn’t following. And I looked at @sarahjpin’s feed. And blow me down if there weren’t an awful lot of the same names frequently appearing on both lists! The most frequent abusers were @eBeth, @elliottbeth, @juliansimpson, @cherrymorello and @abiblackmore.”In for a penny”, I thought, and followed the lot. Now you must follow them as well. Immediately.
And all of a sudden, it made sense! Perfect, logical, sense, like the first time you actually saw a magic eye picture. The fourth, and penultimate, twepiphany;
Twitter’s just a big chat-room!
Here were all these people, mostly writers, musicians or artists, but all amazingly creative and adept at using 140 character to convey meaning, just bouncing off each other. All day long. It was like being back at university, in that heady mix of untapped potential; a bunch of bright people just being themselves, for the sole purpose of making each other laugh. Now that I was following them all, I was seeing the whole picture, rather than random details here and there. The ebb and flow of one enormous, evolving, infinite conversation. This was great! So I dipped my toe in, messaged a few of them, and they welcomed me right in. In no time, I was one of the group. What an unexpected and heart-warming feeling, entirely brought on by a social networking website and a bunch of good people. Weird.
As far as my journey’s concerned, that’s about it. Over time, the group has expanded and developed. Some people don’t tweet as much as they used to, others much more as they find their own voice and their confidence builds. New folk are constantly popping up and joining in and bringing their own unique perspectives and experience.
There’s a real sense of community there. People help each other out with problems, both technical and personal. They support each other when bad things happen. There’s always someone you know online if you need to get something off your chest. And there’s lots and lots of laughter.
In truth, of course, Twitter is much more than just a 90’s chat-room. They were structured and limited, you were never quite sure to whom you were talking and they were the preserve of the nerd; too early in the life of the internet for normal folk to catch on, which made them and their users objects of ridicule.
Twitter is something else entirely. It’s a framework, provided by some very clever coders, precisely for normal folk to do with as we will. People keep tacking bits on. Twitpic. Blip. 12-Seconds. #-tagging of trend topics. Automated links to and from other websites (a link to this post will be Tweeted, within half an hour of me posting it, via a third-party site that connects WordPress.com and Twitter – brilliant!).
This is probably, if not the tip of the iceberg, at least just the beginning of the process. Now that Twitter’s really gathering momentum, how long is it going to be before they introduce skype-like voice chat, or live Twitter TV, or even full-on video conferencing?
Then again, maybe they won’t. Thus far, Twitter has stayed relatively free of the bloaty add-ons that plague sites like Facebook. There’s been the odd game, but people seem to treat them with disdain, and they quickly peter out. And maybe it’s that purity of purpose that will sustain Twitter’s popularity. Just enough extra functionality to be useful and no more.
The Twitter demographic is also slightly odd, and apparently not what the developers envisaged. By and large, we seem to be 30-40-somethings, in stable relationships, with young families. We’re not after a dating agency or somewhere to organise our weekend clubbing (although there have been a few real-live, Twiss-ups…) We’re just after a bit of a chat and a laugh, which Twitter provides with aplomb. It’s a virtual pub, and not one of those insufferable gastro-chains, either. This one serves proper beer, with twigs in.
Obviously, this is just my experience. I imagine there are groups of youngsters (oh God, did I just type that?) using it for their own nefarious means, and there are definitely professionals, spammers and the rest plugging away at whatever it is that they do. So here’s the final Twepiphany;
Twitter is whatever you want it to be*
*As long as you don’t want it to be MySpace, Facebook or MSN.
In the almost six months I’ve been using Twitter, it’s become like an old friend to me. Barely a day has passed when I haven’t logged on at some point. I’m no longer bothered about catching every. Single. Thing everyone says. I couldn’t do it; I follow too many people with too much to say ;-) Now, I just dip in and out when I feel like it. Shoot the breeze with whoever’s there. Or just watch for a bit. Whatever.
Do I think it will still be around in three years? Five? Who knows. There’s too much positive momentum, certainly in my little corner, for me to think it’ll just die quietly like Facebook seems to have done amongst my peers. But then, something new will come along. It always does.
It’s going to have to be pretty damn good, though, and it’s going to have to know how to fight.
GBN